Campaigning & Candidates
How do we find the best candidates and pick the right battles?
Good ideas need a voice in Parliament
The SDP has a clear political philosophy and strong ideas. But our ideas won’t have enough impact until people are in Parliament and council chambers, making our case and making a difference.
That kind of success takes time, and at the moment it rests on a few determined people. We need to build the political machine so that candidates and activists can have a greater impact, year-round, and across multiple years.
A long-term view, sped up wherever possible
Members joined the third campaign surgery to discuss the question: how do we find the best candidates and pick the right battles? These are the key questions that arose.
Changed after the surgeryPick the right battles
We’ll start where elections are frequent, the demographics are right and members can help.
Pick the right battles
We’ll start where elections are frequent, the demographics are right and members can help.
We can’t fight everywhere at once, so we need to choose carefully. The best places to start will have:
- Council elections most years, so candidates can be seen again and again
- A real electoral opportunity, based on many parameters: analysis of where other parties are weakest, how people in a constituency vote, demographics etc
- Enough members nearby to support a campaign
Ideally we’d build clusters: council candidates and a parliamentary candidate working the same area together, so each helps the other become known.
We’ll hone the model in a few places, then roll it out, with support for new teams as they form. We have to build as fast as possible, but also be realistic about resources.
Find the candidates
Good candidates are already among our members, in communities across the country and in other parties.
Find the candidates
Good candidates are already among our members, in communities across the country and in other parties.
Some of our best future candidates are already members. Many have never thought of standing. Others are already getting things done in their communities: running clubs and charities, sitting on school boards, building small businesses, fixing things because nobody else would.
Independent councillors are looking for a political home, and councillors are leaving other parties. Some already share our outlook, and a councillor who joins us brings experience, a local record and a seat. But we have to check the fit: the wrong defections can be worse than no defections. In time, as the party grows, sitting MPs may look for a better home too. Same applies to them.
Behind all of this we need a proper candidate pipeline: an internal pathway for members, outside scouting, and recruitment, vetting, training and selection.
Again, nothing is isolated. We have to make sure we are attracting members in volume, but also sending up a flare for people who want to become a public servant in their community. So communications and membership work feeds in here too.
Build campaigns that last for years
Winning locally takes years of being present, not a few weeks before polling day.
Build campaigns that last for years
Winning locally takes years of being present, not a few weeks before polling day.
Candidates need to be seen in their communities all year round. That takes time, and nobody can do it alone. So every candidate needs support around them:
- A team, with a campaign manager running the project and keeping everyone going
- Training, so they know the politics as well as what works and what the rules are in campaigning (the start of an SDP University)
- Tools and materials, from leaflets to postal vote letters, to checklists – so nobody starts from scratch
- Money, raised and spent where it makes the most difference
Running for office is hard. Morale matters as much as leaflets, and candidates and campaign managers/teams will ideally partner for the long haul.
Above all, campaigns have to build real connections in the community, and keep them going between elections.
There is a caveat to this point, that once again points to how everything is interlinked and must be built as a whole: a nationally known party can speed this up by years. Local candidates have all felt the sting of years of hard work being undone by a newcomer from a party with a big national reputation. So the national ‘air game’ needs to complement the ground game.
Build the dataset
Every campaign should leave us knowing more than before. That knowledge is what wins the next one.
Build the dataset
Every campaign should leave us knowing more than before. That knowledge is what wins the next one.
Campaigns are also how we learn. Every leaflet round, doorstep conversation and election count tells us something: what people care about, street by street, and where our votes are coming from.
Standing candidates can also get electoral data nobody else can: the electoral register, the list of postal voters and, after the election, the marked register showing who actually voted. Even a paper candidate gives us data we can use next time. By law, this electoral data is ringfenced for campaigning.
Alongside it, we can build wider qualitative and quantitative data by ward and constituency: local issues, results, demographics and what we hear on the doorstep. That we can use and leverage much more broadly across the party.
At the moment very little of this is kept or shared. We need to build a system that can securely gather, tag and use both.
Plan – and give members clear asks
Most members want to help. We need to make it easy, with clear asks at the right time.
Plan – and give members clear asks
Most members want to help. We need to make it easy, with clear asks at the right time.
The rough shape of a campaign (both the long and short campaigns) can be planned long in advance. There are key milestones and things that must be done 6-12 months before a single vote is cast.
So we can bring members into these plans. Clear, specific asks with enough notice (deliver 200 leaflets on your own street on a set weekend, help with a street stall on a fixed date) are easier to commit to and easier to keep. They will all add up.
People campaign more when they know other members locally. So the social aspect of the party has to continue and expand. We’ll talk about this more next week during Membership & Regional Growth week.
What members said
Members joined the third campaign surgery to discuss the question: how do we find the best candidates and pick the right battles? These are the key questions that arose.
Where should we start?
Use a mixture of analysis and creativity to find initial focus areas to test.
Where should we start?
Use a mixture of analysis and creativity to find initial focus areas to test.
I showed a first draft of a battleground map: every ward and constituency, when it next has council elections, who holds it, and how closely voters’ values match ours.
Members pointed out that decades of election and polling data has never had a party like ours in it, so the usual tools can’t reliably tell us where our voters are. We have to take educated guesses and find our own signals.
Members asked for two more layers: where we’ve stood before and how we did, and where our members are. On ‘where we’ve stood before’ I’d add data on whether it was a real campaign or a paper candidate so we can contextualise the stats.
One member suggested looking at places that have swung to Reform but show high deprivation: culturally conservative, but wanting the state to do more on the economy.
The battleground map (draft)
Every ward and constituency in Great Britain, with council election years, who holds each seat and a first attempt at scoring the opportunity for us.
Are we missing places we assume are weak?
Possibly. So we should test a few different kinds of seat, not only the obvious ones.
Are we missing places we assume are weak?
Possibly. So we should test a few different kinds of seat, not only the obvious ones.
The South East has one of our largest memberships, but a simple reading of the numbers would never pick it. Are we missing something? The key is not just regional membership but enough members to provide candidates for the right seats within a region.
Yorkshire is strong for us and we should keep building there. But I’d also pick three or four different kinds of seat and run proper trials, so we learn what works where.
The analogy: a comedian doesn’t set out to borrow a bit of five other comedians’ audiences. They find their own by being themselves and drawing the people to them. We will have to ‘find our audience’.
Should we put all campaigners into one or two seats?
We have to be clear-eyed about resources required for a strong campaign, but also create a way in to becoming a focus seat.
Should we put all campaigners into one or two seats?
We have to be clear-eyed about resources required for a strong campaign, but also create a way in to becoming a focus seat.
Several members argued we should concentrate: pick seats volunteers can reach, and bring people in, with money for transport.
The numbers back this up as an initial approach, while we build up the membership. I showed a rough calculator of the volunteer hours a campaign needs against the hours our members can realistically give. At our current size it adds up to a handful of serious ward campaigns, or one serious Westminster campaign. That is why people have been travelling across the country to help.
But concentration can’t be permanent. A former Lib Dem told me that sending everyone to one seat built strongholds, but the areas the travelling volunteers came from never grew, and some people left because they felt forgotten. So we need a ladder. We focus at the start, and when an area has enough members to run a campaign, it gets the chance to.
What can we feasibly do? (draft)
Move the sliders for members, how many get involved and how many hours they give, and see how many campaigns of each kind that could carry.
Where will the candidates come from?
Candidates, more than leaflets, are what holds us back. And they need a team behind them.
Where will the candidates come from?
Candidates, more than leaflets, are what holds us back. And they need a team behind them.
People who have run our campaigns have said the real limit is finding people willing to stand, in the right places for enough time to make a difference. Good campaigns have been lost when a candidate had to pull out late. There are wards where we’d do well and nobody wants to stand.
So the membership has to grow, because every new member is also a possible campaigner or candidate. People who help on a campaign are far more likely to stand later, once they’ve seen what it involves.
We can also find candidates/representatives by scouting locally, and – carefully – by defection.
A member made the point that candidates should lead locally: lifting the membership and getting people out on the streets. In return they need real support.
How do we get into local networks?
Find where local life is organised, and be useful there.
How do we get into local networks?
Find where local life is organised, and be useful there.
Local candidates win by being known long before the election. Members listed ways in: charities and community groups, school governors, business forums, trade unions, and parish councils, where many seats go uncontested.
Citizens Advice stood out. One member noticed how many of the other trustees in their CAB are councillors from a particular party. Citizens Advice gathers data on the problems that keep coming up locally, and it trains its volunteers properly, for example on the benefits system. That is exactly the knowledge a candidate needs for casework. It varies by place, but it could be useful info while also serving the local community.
Where the local charity sector is closed to us, we can still be seen. Litter picks or other community action days can bring attention, again while serving the community in useful ways.
Who else is already doing this work?
Plenty of groups share parts of our outlook. We should work alongside them.
Who else is already doing this work?
Plenty of groups share parts of our outlook. We should work alongside them.
Members pointed to groups we have a lot in common with: campaigns for growth and for building things, pub debating societies, local political discussion groups, and campaigns on public ownership. Some members already go to their events, and some regions already work with them.
One of the best ways to grow is to find the people who have already done the work, and join in.
What should we learn from every campaign?
Write down what people tell us. Small at first, but it builds.
What should we learn from every campaign?
Write down what people tell us. Small at first, but it builds.
A member suggested every canvasser jots down what people want to talk about on the doorstep, which policies land and which pitch works. It’s small at first, but data gets more useful the more of it you have and the better you use it.
Another suggested a simple survey: ask members, and their friends and family, what they think when they look at the SDP.
And every election we stand in gives us the electoral register, the postal voters list and, after the count, the marked register showing who actually voted. While this data is ringfenced, it can still be very useful to us.
What's changed
Members tested the proposals and added to them. The discussion changed one proposal and set out what has to happen first.
- Changed after the surgery
Members asked for two more layers on the map: where our members are, and where we have stood before. I won’t have the figures during the campaign, but will consider for the actual working group. We’ll also trial three or four different kinds of seat, including places we’d normally assume are weak. Concentration comes with a ladder: when an area has enough members to run a campaign, it gets the chance to.
What I’d do first
We need to be ready for May 2027, so this starts straight away. I’d work with the NCC, including the regional chairs, and data analysts and experienced campaigners who are willing to help, to agree the first target areas. The map is only one part of that. We don’t yet have enough data of our own, so local knowledge matters just as much: where our regions think we can win, and where we already have strong candidates ready to stand. Then we build campaign teams around those candidates, and start the plans early enough to go into May with a run-up.
Could you help?
Have you stood for election, run a campaign or worked as an agent? Ideas to share? Send me a message.